Quality & evidence

Source to supply.
Every step made visible.

Evidence is reviewed in context. A laboratory value, sample result or origin claim only becomes useful when it relates to the actual mineral, grade, batch route and intended application.

01Source02Mineralogy03Grade04Evidence05Evaluation06Supply

A disciplined route from claim to decision.

Every stage asks a different question. Together they reduce the risk of selecting a product by label alone.

  1. 01

    Source

    Identify a viable deposit, processor and route against mineral, volume and application needs.

  2. 02

    Mineralogy

    Review declared zeolite family, associated minerals and the source-specific analytical basis.

  3. 03

    Grade

    Define the processed particle band, fines, moisture, density and practical handling criteria.

  4. 04

    Evidence

    Assess available XRD, XRF, PSD, CEC, TDS, SDS and related files where relevant.

  5. 05

    Evaluation

    Use representative samples and application-led testing rather than transferring claims between grades.

  6. 06

    Supply

    Confirm specification, packaging, repeatability, lead time and delivery before commercial supply.

What the evidence can—and cannot—do

Source data narrows options. Testing confirms fit.

No unverified result is presented as a guaranteed product specification.

Current documents and test methods are checked for the proposed source and grade. Where performance depends on a customer process, formulation, water chemistry, soil, bedding system or use rate, the supplied sample should be evaluated under relevant conditions.

View technical information

Evidence for your requirement

Ask for the right file, not every file.

Tell us which values, standards or decisions the documentation needs to support.

Request technical documentation